Experts: Do Not Waste Incineration Technology Into Four Errors

HC Chemical Network Information, “garbage is a systematic, no single technology that can completely solve the problem of a municipal solid waste, and waste treatment technology is not the best, not only is the best.” Xu Wenlong China before Urban Construction Research Institute In an interview with reporters, pointed out that public awareness of the existence of the solid waste incineration four errors.

“A city’s waste disposal should be according to their Economy Development level and characteristics of the optimized integration of multiple technologies, this is the direction of development. “Xu Wenlong, said that Beijing is still waste a single model, taking up a lot of land, but the overall look is not sustainable, so choose a new technology is the only way. In the end is burning or a better technology? Now, burning or recognized as the world’s best technology, I do not rule out the emergence of new technologies, but for now, Beijing should go multi-technology integrated development model reasonable. One

Mistakes: Foreign waste incineration plants have shut down many answers: No

Statistics major European countries refuse point of view, the Europe 423 incineration plants, incineration is about 0.25 kg per capita / day. From a few years, the EU waste incineration capacity is increasing, of course, incineration is also increasing, but because Europe’s population is relatively stable, the amount of waste produced is relatively stable, the basic grow.

To the United States is relatively unique, because the United States the vast territory that is now landfill-based waste disposal, incineration in the country has maintained a 14% treatment rate. Incineration plant in the United States is not closed, but through higher Environmental protection Standards to transform the old incineration plant, and maintain the incineration ratio. United States 87 incineration field, respectively in 26 states. In 2007, a total of 220 units incinerator, the total size of 93,943 tons / day. America’s burning capacity is 2 times the concentration of economic development areas in the northeast.

The Japanese situation, Japan is the world’s waste incineration technology faster, and Japan refuse incineration rate remained at 75% level, basically the first burn garbage, can not handle the garbage and then into the landfill, It has been 10 years of development history. View from Tokyo, the Tokyo metropolitan area are 23 incineration plant, Tokyo’s most beautiful chimneys are incineration plant. Only a burning field (Setagaya method cleaning plant) because of the ongoing maintenance of transformation of 30-year history, the rest are in normal operation.

Misunderstandings 2: China’s burning technology behind answered: No

Our national waste incineration technology is the nations card technology, currently the world’s most advanced waste incineration technology have entered China. The situation on the incinerator, Germany Martin and Mitsubishi Cooperation Developed technology first entered China, there are a lot of practice, such as Shenzhen, Guangzhou; Japan takuma co Secretary SN type developed an incinerator in the country also has many applications, such as Beijing, Tianjin; European Seegers burning technology into China, used in Suzhou, Shenzhen; Japan’s Hitachi Zosen incinerator used in Chengdu; Japan’s JFE incinerator used in Qingdao and so on. Should be said that all kinds of incineration technology in China, the world almost every application. Alstom Sity2000 type currently burning technology has the localized application in Chongqing and Fuzhou. We also own internal R & D localization of the burning of some technologies, such as two-stage incineration technology.

Mistakes three: solid waste incinerator in two! F English is not controlled answer: No

On waste gas treatment, especially the second! F English problem, in fact, China’s two! F England has been demonized. Second, in the whole society! F British emissions which, the total amount of solid waste combustion accounted for a very low, such as Germany’s total of 0.5 grams, is very limited, not two! F English emission factors. From our point of view, according to 2007 statistics, China’s burning of plant 2! F British emissions of the entire society, compared with only 3.3%, a large number of generated source is not in the incineration plant. Of course,